Twilight of Metaphysics. Epiphany of the ?????
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Examination of the dual reason of objectuality, material / formal, and the subdivisions of the latter extracted from Thomism in order to resolve the deficit of reason that would deprive metaphysics of its certificate of science with the decline of exemplary causality. Could the enveloping substantivity in its actions of the totality of a system support contemporary metaphysics in a fight with phenomenologies deviated from the autarkic eîdos and the principle of constitutional sufficiency?
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Carthaginensia retains the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published works, and favors and allows the reuse of the same under the license of use indicated in the following point.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons By (CC By) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exhibited, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work) are cited; ii) they are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license of use are mentioned.
References
Alvira, Tomás. «Esencialismo y verdad». Anuario Filosófico 15 nº 1 (1982): 149-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/009.15.30215
Besnier, Bernard. «Cajétan-In 'De Ente et Essentia' quaestio I». En Rationalisme analogique et humanisme théologique: la culture de Thomas de Vio 'Il Gaetano', ed. por Bruno Pinchard y Saverio Ricci, 71-83. Nápoles: 1993.
Elías, Gloria Silvana. «La Persona Humana: El Aporte De Juan Duns Escoto: Human Person». Carthaginensia 73 (2022), 33-51.
Ghisalberti, Alessandro. «Essere infinito e univocità dell'essere nella metafisica di Duns Scoto». Carthaginensia 70 (2020), 457-478.
Hund, W. B. The Principles for the Division of the Speculative Sciences according to St. Thomas, Cajetan and John of St. Thomas. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, 1960.
Llamas Roig, Vicente. «Adversus Scotum: Del Objetivismo Especular Al Singularismo gnoseológico». Carthaginensia 70 (2020), 419-55.
Llamas Roig, Vicente. «Sendas rotas: la metafísica como fuga metafórica hacia el ser de fenómeno». Cauriensia 14 (2019), 81-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-4256.14.81
Maritain, Jacques. Los grados del saber. Distinguir para unir. Buenos Aires: Club de Lectores, 1978.
Merlan, Philip. «Abstraction and Metaphysics in St. Thomas’ Summa». Journal of the History of Ideas 14 (1953): 284-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2707477
Muñoz, Ceferino P. Objetividad y ciencia en Cayetano. Una prefiguración de la modernidad. Santiago de Chile: RIL Editores, 2016.
Nordberg, K. «Abstraction and Separation in the Light of the Historical Roots of Thomas’ Tripartition of the Theoretical Sciences». En Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy. Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy (1987), vol. III, editado por Reijo Tyorinoja, 144-159. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino, 1990.
Ramírez, Santiago M. «De ipsa philosophia in universum secundum doctrinam aristotelico thomisticam». Ciencia Tomista 26 (1922): 33-62.
Riva, Franco. «Il Gaetano e l´ente come primum cognitum». Rivista di Filosofia Neoescolastica 85 nº 1 (1993): 3-20.
Simmons, Edward D. «The Thomistic Doctrine of the Three Degrees of Formal Abstraction». Thomist 22 (1959): 37-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1959.0002
Van Riet, Georges. «La Théorie Thomiste De L’abstraction». Revue Philosophique de Louvain (1952): 353-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/phlou.1952.4403
Vicente Burgoa, Lorenzo. «De Modis Abstractionis Iuxta Sanctum Thomam». Divus Thomas (1964): 278-299.
Zubiri, Xavier. Sobre la Esencia 1. Madrid: Alianza, 1998.
Zubiri, Xavier. Estructura de la Metafísica. Madrid: Alianza, 2016.