Binding nature and functions of the jurisprudence of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present contribution aims to examine the value of jurisprudence and to offer a reflection to determine whether the functions attributed to it by the canonical legislation, endow it with obligatory nature, and whether consequently, the ecclesiastical tribunals of the particular churches, ought to resolve the causes according to the same criteria applied by the Tribunal of the Roman Rota. In this sense, it is convenient to begin by explaining the concept of jurisprudence and by analyzing in detail, the functions granted by the legislator, such as a mean for interpreting the law and as a source to supply in case of lacuna legis.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Carthaginensia retains the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published works, and favors and allows the reuse of the same under the license of use indicated in the following point.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons By (CC By) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exhibited, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work) are cited; ii) they are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license of use are mentioned.
References
ARROBA CONDE, M. J., Diritto processuale canonico (ROMA 2006).
BEGUS, C., L’armonia della giurisprudenza (ROMA 2003).
DANIEL, W. L., “The notion of Canonical Jurisprudence and its Application to the Tribunal of the Roman Rota and Causes of Nullity of Marriage”, en: K. Martens (ed.) Justice and Mercy have met, Pope Francis and the reform of the marriage nullity process (WASHINGTON 2017) 271-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1n2tx3n.11
DE PAOLIS, V., “La giurisprudenza del tribunale della Rota Romana e i tribunali locali”, Periodica 98 NO. 2 (2009) 275-319.
DE PAOLIS, V., D’AURIA A., Le Norme Generali Commento al Codice di Diritto Canonico, Urbaniana University Press (Città del Vaticano 2008).
Escribano Arráez, Miguel Angel. «La Necesidad Del Estudio de la teología y su relación con el Derecho canónico como Reflejo del Primer Principio en la construcción del Pueblo de Dios». Carthaginensia 75 (2023) 375-387.
GARCÍA FAILDE, J. J., Nuevo estudio sobre trastornos psíquicos y nulidad matrimonial (Salamanca 2003).
GARCÍA FAILDE, J. J., “El juez, intérprete y creador de leyes”: Revista Jurídica de Catalunya, Vol. 94, 3 (1995) 843-858.
KILLERMANN S., Die Rota Romana, Wesen und Wirken des päpstlichen Gerichtshofes im Wandel der Zeit (FRANKFURT 2009). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01133-3
MONTINI, G. P., “La Rota Romana e i Tribunali Locali”, Studi giuridici 87 (2010) 41-61.
NAVARRETE, U., “Independencia de los jueces eclesiásticos en la interpretación y aplicación del derecho: formación de jurisprudencias matrimoniales locales”, en Id., Derecho matrimonial canónico. Evolución a la luz del Concilio Vaticano II (Madrid 2007) 1085-1124.
OTADUY, J., ”Comentario al canon 16”, en ComEx, I, 351-358.
OTADUY, J..,”Comentario al canon 19”, en ComEx, I, 380-398.
OTADUY, J., “Positivismos ingenuos. A propósito del discurso de Benedicto XVI sobre interpretación auténtica de la ley canónica” (21-I-2012): Ius Canonicum 54 (2014) 23-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/016.54.246
POMPEDDA, M. F., “La giurisprudenza come fonte di diritto nell’ordinamento canonico matrimoniale” Quaderni dello Studio Rotale (1987) 47-68.
RODRÍGUEZ OCAÑA, R. “El tribunal de la Rota y la unidad de la jurisprudencia”: Ius Canonicum XXX 60 (1990) 423-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/016.30.17341
STANKIEWICZ, A., “L’unità della giurisprudenza e il ruolo della Rota Romana”, Ius Ecclesiae XXII (2010) 591-610.
VARALTA, Z. “De iurisprudentiae conceptu”: Periodica 62 (1973) 39-57.
WRENN, L.G., “Notes on Canonical Jurisprudence” The Jurist 29 (1969) 65-78.