Which freedom and which religion? Anthropo-theological considerations on religious freedom
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Starting from a brief comparison between the declaration Dignitatis Humanae and the document of the International Theological Commission on Religious Freedom (2020), the article intends to discuss the current meaning of religious freedom, in an environment of strong transformation of religious experiences. In this environment, the discussion on the notion of freedom serves as inspiration for a criterion of distinction between the various more or less sacralizing religious experiences. From a possible relationship between freedom and religion, the notion of “religion of freedom” is reached, which will condition not only the religious experience, but also a deep meaning of religious freedom.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Carthaginensia retains the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published works, and favors and allows the reuse of the same under the license of use indicated in the following point.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons By (CC By) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exhibited, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work) are cited; ii) they are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license of use are mentioned.
References
Bartolomei, Teresa. “A serpente e o bezerro. A idolatria como patologia simbólica. Um ponto de vista bíblico”. Ephata, 2, 2 (2020): 177 237. https://doi.org/10.34632/ephata.2020.9539.
Comisión Teológica Internacional, La libertad religiosa para el bien de todos. Aproximación teológica a los desafíos contemporáneos (Madrid: BAC 2019).
Concilio Vaticano II, Declaración Dignitatis Humanae sobre la libertad religiosa, 15, https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae_sp.html (consulta: 13.072023).
Derrida, Jacques. Donner la mort. Paris: Galilée, 1999.
Duque, João Manuel. “El universal concreto. Consideraciones teológicas sobre la globalización”. Teología (Buenos Aires) 56 (2019): 57-75.
Duque, João. 2022. «Catolicismo, Modernidade E pós-Modernidade: Catholicity, Modernity and Posmodernity». Carthaginensia 38 (73):129-42.
Duque, João Manuel. «Comunidades de convicción y redes sociales ante el desafío de la libertad religiosa», en La libertad religiosa para el bien de todos: texto y comentario del documento de la Comisión Teológica Internacional, ed. por Javier Maria Prades López, 161-172. Madrid: BAC, 2021.
Felice, Massimo Di. Cidadania digital. São Paulo: Paulus, 2021.
Justo Domínguez, Emilio-José. 2024. «El Concepto De Libertad En El Debate teológico Actual». Carthaginensia 40 (77):177-97. https://doi.org/10.62217/carth.531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62217/carth.531
Levinas, Emmanuel. Du Sacré au Saint. Cinq nouvelles lectures talmudiques. Paris: Ed. de Minuit, 1977.
Patocka, Jan. Essais hérétiques sur la philosophie de l’histoire. Paris: Ed. Verdier, 1999.
Ricoeur, Paul. “J. Patocka et le nihilisme”, in Lectures 1, Paris: Seuil, 1991.
Sequeri, Pirangelo. “Il sacro, l’evangelo, la fede. Un compito per la teologia fondamentale”. Ephata 2, 2. (2020): 9-19. https://doi.org/10.34632/ephata.2020.9533.