The Intrusion of pets into Spanish homes. Why do families have pets?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent years in advanced societies a process of individualization has been consolidated in the different social institutions, also in families. Manifesting it self in diverse and complex ways. This article describes and analyzes the irruption of pets in Spanish homes and aims to understand the motivations of families (their members) to live with pets. A relationship was established between the decrease in family members and the entry of pets into homes.
Relevant literature, quantitative data and 10 in-depth interviews were used for the research: 5 parents and 5 young adults knowledgeable about the subject. They have explained their reflections, experiences and experiences on pets highlighting their importance and significance. People without experiences and relationships (past and/or present) with domestic animals are considered a waste of time, resources... ; on the contrary, those pet caregivers value their emotional and affective contributions and their role in increasing their well-being.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Carthaginensia retains the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published works, and favors and allows the reuse of the same under the license of use indicated in the following point.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons By (CC By) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exhibited, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work) are cited; ii) they are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license of use are mentioned.
References
Bauman, Z. (2003). Modernidad líquida. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Beck, U. (2002). La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Caín, A. (1985). Pets as family members. Marriage & Family Review, 8(3-4), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v08n03_02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v08n03_02
Charles, N. (2014). "Animals just love you as you are": Experiencing kinship across the species barrier. Sociology, 48(4), 715-730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513515353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513515353
Elzo, J. (2000). El silencio de los adolescentes: lo que no cuentan a sus padres. Madrid: Temas de hoy.
Giddens, A. (2000). Un mundo desbocado: los efectos de la globalización en nuestras vidas. Madrid: Taurus.
Gómez, L., Atehortua, C. & Orozco, S. (2007). La influencia de las mascotas en la vida humana. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 20(3), 377-386.
https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/rccp/article/view/324155
Hochschild, A. (2001). Las cadenas mundiales de afecto y asistencia y la plusvalía emocional. En Giddens, A. & Hutton, W. En el límite. La vida en el capitalismo global. Barcelona. Tusquets.
Kim, J., LaRose, R. & Peng, W. (2009). Loneliness as the Cause and the Effect of Problematic Internet Use: The Relationship between Internet Use and Psychological Well-Being. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 451-455. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0327
Lipovestsky, G. (2008). La sociedad de la decepción. Barcelona: Editorial Anagrama.
Londoño, M., Lemos, M. & Orejuela, J. (2018). Impacto de la adopción de una mascota en las percepciones de bienestar físico y emocional. Revista de Psicología, 10(2), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.v10n2a03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rp.v10n2a03
Mils, C. (1983). La imaginación sociológica. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Rubio, M. & Varas, J. (1999). El análisis de la realidad en la intervención social: métodos y técnicas de investigación. Madrid: CCS.
Schvaneveldt, P., Young, M., Schvaneveldt, J. & Kivett, V. (2001). Interaction of people and pets in the family setting: A life course perspective. Journal of Teaching in Marriage & Family, 1(2), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.1300/J226v01n02_03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J226v01n02_03
Tahull, J. & Montero, I. (2018). Sociedad, familia y escuela en la postmodernidad. Interacciones turbulentas, relativismo y anomia. Análisis: revista colombiana de humanidades, 50(93), 427-447. https://doi.org/10.15332/10.15332/s0120-8454.2018.0093.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/10.15332/s0120-8454.2018.0093.08
Tahull, J. & Montero, I. (2019). La transformación de las familias. La irrupción del hijo único. Miscelánea Comillas, 77(151), 317-340. https://doi.org/10.14422/mis.v77.i151.y2019.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14422/mis.v77.i151.y2019.003
Tahull, J. (2021). ¿Cómo han vivido los jóvenes durante la pandemia del Covid-19? Malestares de una vida confinada. Revista Antropología Experimental, 21, 287-302. https://doi.org/10.17561/rae.v21.6030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17561/rae.v21.6030
Turner, W. (2005). The role of companion animals throughout the family life cycle. Journal of Family Social Work, 9(4), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J039v09n0402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J039v09n04_02
Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B. & Bulsara, M. (2005). The pet connection: Pets as a conduit for social capital? Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1159-1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.017