El Problema de la Metafísica de Aristóteles en la antigüedad: una crisis prematura The problem of Aristotle's Metaphysics in antiquity: a premature crisis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Este artículo trata de describir cómo la Metafísica de Aristóteles ha constituido desde la antigüedad una materia problemática. Las dudas se inician con su hipotética composición originaria en la escuela peripatética, su primera transmisión y su práctica desaparición. La edición canónica de Andrónico plantea cuestiones sobre el criterio de su ordenación, e incluso del título mismo. Mástarde se interpreta de diversas formas sentido de su contenido doctrinal, que, cada vez más, se inclina a una sistematicidad orientada hacia una finalidad teológica, tal como se entenderá la obra en su recepción medieval.
Abstract: This paper attempts to describe how Aristotle's Metaphysics has been a problematic subject since ancient times. Doubts begin with its hypothetical original composition in the Peripatetic school, its first transmission and its practical disappearance. The canonical edition of Andronicus raises questions about the criteria for its ordination, and even about the title itself. Later on, it is interpreted in various ways in terms of its doctrinal content, which is increasingly inclined towards a systematic nature oriented towards a theological purpose, as the work will be understood in its medieval reception.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Carthaginensia retains the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published works, and favors and allows the reuse of the same under the license of use indicated in the following point.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons By (CC By) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exhibited, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work) are cited; ii) they are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license of use are mentioned.
References
Anagnostopoulos, G. (Ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
Aubenque, P., Le problème de l’être chez Aristote, Paris, P.U.F., 1962 (edición española, El problema del ser en Aristóteles, Madrid, Taurus, 1987).
Baltussen, H., The Peripatetics: Aristotle's Heirs, 322 BCE-200 CE, London-New York, Routledge, 2016.
Cuccia, Emiliano Javier. 2018. «Notas sobre la recepción de Aristóteles en el Estudio de las Virtudes Morales de Juan Duns Escoto: Notes on John Duns Scotus’ Reception of Aristotle in the Study of Moral Virtues». Carthaginensia 34 (65):15-28.
Düring, I., Aristóteles. Exposición e interpretación de su pensamiento, México, U.N.A.M., 1990.
Düring, I., Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition, Göteborg, Institute of Classical Studies, 1957.
Falcon, A. (Ed.), The reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, Leiden, Boston, Brill, 2016.
Gastaldi, S., Zizza, C., Da Stagira a Roma. Prospettive aristoteliche tra storia e filosofia, a cura di Silvia Gastaldi e Cesare Zizza (indici a cura di Serena A. Brioschi), Acts of the International Aristotle Conference “Da Stagira a Parigi: prospettive aristoteliche tra Antichità e Medioevo”, Pavia I, May, 30-31 2016, Pisa, ETS, 2018.
Graham, D., Aristotle’s two systems, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1987.
Grayeff, F., Aristotle and his school. An inquiry into the history of the peripatos. With a commentary on Metaphysics Z, H, ? and ?, London, Duckworth, 1974.
Schofield, M. (Ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC. New Directions for Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Sorabji, R., Aristotle transformed. The ancient Commentators on Aristotle, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1990.